|
Questioning the motives of Save Darfur movement
Home News Tribune Online 07/11/07
HASSAN
MAHMOUD
The humanitarian disaster in Darfur that claimed the lives of 200,000 people
is heart-wrenching and needs to come to an end. However, in comparison with the
more vicious human slaughters that are taking place in Congo resulting in the
deaths of 4 million people, one would think that the latter should grab more
attention than the former. That is not the case.

Hardly anybody in the United States knows about the Congo's war. One courageous
reporter, Nicholas Kristof wrote: "Just imagine 4 million Americans or Europeans
had been killed in a war, and that white families were starving to death as a
result of that war. The victims may be black and poor, but that should not make
this war in Congo no less an international priority." An editorial in The New
York Times of June 12, stated: "Darfur is not the only place where people are
dying in staggering numbers. Conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo has
taken more than 3 million lives."
On May 5, 2006, the Sudanese government signed a peace agreement,
orchestrated by Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoelick, with the largest rebel
group, the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA), but the other two minor groups refused
to sign and continued the fighting and even attacking the African Union Forces
established by the United Nations and hijacking U.N. relief convoys. President
Bush received Minni Minnawi, the leader of the SLA, in the White House and
congratulated him on his peace effort. The BBC's Alex Last in Abuja said the
groups that didn't sign the peace pact face being isolated by the international
community and will eventually split, further destabilizing the region that is
already plagued by violence.
So why this concerted campaign by the Save Darfur Coalition in the media?
Until now, the United Nations refused to consider what is going on in Darfur as
genocide. It is a civil war between a government and some rebel factions, stoked
by foreign interests.
To quote an article in The New York Times of June 2: "Even as advocacy groups
attained the seeming triumph of President Bush's new sanctions against Sudan,
the organization that helped bring the conflict in Darfur to the world's
attention is in upheaval, firing its director (David) Rubenstein, and when Ruth
Messinger of the American Jewish World Service and a Save Darfur board member
was asked about that, she declined to comment. Save Darfur has gotten in hot
water with aid groups helping the refugees of the conflict. Save Darfur's
advertising was confusing the public and damaging the relief effort. Sam
Worthington, the president of InterAction, a coalition of aid groups complained
to Mr. Rubenstein of the inability of Save Darfur to be informed by the
realities on the ground and misstating facts. Some relief agencies said that
they were horrified when Save Darfur's ads in February reported that
international relief organizations, among others, had agreed that the time for
negotiating with the Sudanese government had ended. Aid groups also complain
that Save Darfur, whose budget last year was $15 million, doesn't spend that
money on aid for the long-suffering citizens of the region."
Elie Wiesel pressured President Bush to declare from the Holocaust Museum
that what is taking place in Darfur is genocide equal to the Holocaust.
Unfortunately, we haven't heard Wiesel condemning the killing of 4 million
people in Congo or the Iraq war, which resulted in the death of 3,600 of our
soldiers and maiming of more than 30,000, plus the deaths of more than 700,000
Iraqi civilians and the resulting 4 million refugees, most of whom fled to Syria
and Jordan, thus straining the fragile economies of these poor countries. We
haven't heard Mr. Wiesel and the Save Darfur organization asking our government
to share the economic burden of the refugees in these countries or allow a
substantial number of those refugees to come to the United States as we allowed
800,000 Vietnamese refugees to come to this country. They are rather angling to
inject our troops into another misadventure in Sudan.
It is the conviction of the Arab and Muslim people in the Middle East that
Israel and its supporters in the United States would like to see all Arab
countries destabilized and in turmoil so they would be unable to resist Israel's
colonial schemes in the Middle East.
"Be Counted" columnist Hassan Mahmoud is a resident of Westfield.
|