|
Immigration enforcement law won't help
police catch criminals
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 10/1/06
BY AREF ASSAF
The passage of the Immigration Law Enforcement Act of 2006 poses
serious challenges to New Jersey police departments and the
citizens they are empowered to serve and protect. Several towns
have begun introducing and implementing polices to deprive
illegal immigrant of town services, subjecting them to
discriminatory and sometimes vengeful acts.
The law is promoted as a tool to protect us from immigrants who
have been served deportation papers but who continue to "hide
out" in local communities, committing violent acts. What they
are not telling the public is that the law authorizes local
enforcement officers to prosecute non-citizens for civil
immigration violations. Consequently, the law opens the doors
for the random spot-checking of anyone (citizen or non-citizen)
who police suspect lacks immigration papers.
The deputizing of police officers as immigrations
agents is known as 287(g), for a section
of the 1996 Immigration and Nationality Act that allows local
officers, after being trained, to “identify, process, and when
appropriate, detain immigration offenders they encounter during
their regular, daily law-enforcement activity.” Field officers
receive five weeks of training with immigration agents,
including how to tap into immigration databases and process
aliens for deportation proceedings.
Since the question of legal status will not be
considered for white suspects or violators, New Jersey law
enforcement authorities would be engaged in a statewide racial
profiling of all non-white residents.
Police departments across the country have warned Congress that
the new law is not going to improve their ability to track down
immigrant criminals.
In the early 1900s, the
growth in immigration was linked to an
increase in crime rates. While recent
polls have shown that there is a
perception that the influx of illegal
immigrants starting in the 1990s has
driven up crime rates, several recent
studies show that is not the case and,
in fact, some sociologists believe the
concentration of immigrants has kept the
overall crime rate down in some
communities.
According to a
Dr. Ruben Rumbaut, a professor at
the University of California at Irvine,
who has studied incarceration rates of
immigrants, it is impossible to
measure crime rates of immigrants
directly, especially illegal immigrants.
“The statistics aren’t collected that
way,” he said.
It is more likely to have the opposite effect.
Instead of helping police, it will create a wall of silence in
immigrant communities that will obstruct any kind of police work
that relies on immigrant witnesses and informants. This will be
especially detrimental for immigrant women trying to free
themselves from their abusers.
Community workers have known for years that criminals who prey
on immigrants keep their victims silent by threatening to have
them deported. Shelter workers can point to hundreds of cases
where victims of abuse decide to keep quiet because of their
immigration status. There are also plenty of horror stories
where immigrant victims of sexual assault and other crimes come
forward only to find themselves being investigated by the
police.
This is why Congress passed special laws (like the 1994 and 2000
Violence Against Women acts) that allow immigrant victims of
abuse and assault to gain legal status on their own.
By extending civil immigration enforcement to local police, the
law would make battered immigrants even more fearful of turning
to the police and government caseworkers. Moreover, these fears
are not just limited to people who have entered the U.S.
illegally. They will also creep into the lives of immigrants
whose temporary work visas expired while waiting for their green
card and to legal immigrants who have close friends or relatives
who are undocumented. Under the new law, all of these immigrants
will have some reasonable fear that any interaction they have
with local police could result in their detention and swift
deportation.
Instead of helping police track down immigrant criminals, the
law will only add to the worries of law-abiding immigrants. It
will also create a climate where people who victimize immigrants
will have more advantage to keep their victims quiet. It is not
clear how this will enhance public safety for immigrants or
citizens.
While the bill's title and the rhetoric surrounding it portray
this as anti-crime legislation, it is clearly more than that.
The bill authorizes police to enforce federal civil immigration
laws; it allows police to act as immigration officers.
State and local police are authorized to enforce criminal
immigration laws and to notify federal immigration officials
about foreign nationals in their custody who have committed
crimes. But this bill requires police to also enforce civil
immigration laws, or lose federal funds earmarked to reimburse
them for detaining criminal lawbreakers.
To facilitate this new role for local police, the bill expands
the scope of the National Crime Information Center database —
accessed in routine situations by police to identify wanted
criminals — to include people who have civil immigration
violations.
This bill would impose significant new reporting requirements on
these critically understaffed and under-funded agencies. As it
is now, law enforcement departments are stretched beyond
capacity. They do not have the extra time, money or staff to
take on what is rightly a federal duty.
By turning police into immigration agents, the new law ensures
that more immigrants avoid contact with local law enforcement,
putting entire communities at risk. Word will quickly spread
among immigrant communities that if they — as victims, witnesses
or concerned residents — have any contact with police, they or
their family members will risk deportation. They will remain
silent and our streets will be less safe as a result. Experience
shows that this fear will extend not only to contact with local
police, but also to the fire department, hospitals and the
public school system.
Who knows better about keeping our communities safe — Congress,
or our state and local police?
Aref Assaf is president of the American Arab Forum, Paterson.
Copyright © 2006 Asbury Park Press. All rights
reserved.
|